<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transformed Sexes &#8211; the godly manliness of women. or ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enchristos.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/transformed-sexes-the-godly-manliness-of-women-or/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enchristos.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/transformed-sexes-the-godly-manliness-of-women-or/</link>
	<description>tales from a north thorpe ...a perspective from under the son</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:23:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan W Northup</title>
		<link>http://enchristos.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/transformed-sexes-the-godly-manliness-of-women-or/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan W Northup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enchristos.wordpress.com/?p=121#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Most definitely!  And so Chrysostom&#039;s desire for transformed weakened vessels into manly vessels is the wrong kind of transformation.  The Cross, and the Resurrection were not a generic transformation into something completely other, but a restoration, renewal, of what was intended to be, but on a more glorious level.  Thanks for the insight, oh so strong woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most definitely!  And so Chrysostom&#8217;s desire for transformed weakened vessels into manly vessels is the wrong kind of transformation.  The Cross, and the Resurrection were not a generic transformation into something completely other, but a restoration, renewal, of what was intended to be, but on a more glorious level.  Thanks for the insight, oh so strong woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angiebee</title>
		<link>http://enchristos.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/transformed-sexes-the-godly-manliness-of-women-or/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>angiebee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enchristos.wordpress.com/?p=121#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the &quot;weaker sex&quot; was never intended to be weak. Perhaps the women who stood by the cross were not so much being &quot;manly&quot; as demonstrating true femininity in their faith and loyalty to the Savior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the &#8220;weaker sex&#8221; was never intended to be weak. Perhaps the women who stood by the cross were not so much being &#8220;manly&#8221; as demonstrating true femininity in their faith and loyalty to the Savior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
